![]() I know this is a lousy argument, but dedicated 2D and 3D spaces make more sense to me. It has a standalone 2D drawing mode which allows focusing on refining the 2D drawings in a familiar paper space with predictableĭimension scaling. The GoodĪ thing that makes CADdy++ stand out is it does not try to copy AutoCAD. ![]() The lack of tutorials and accessible information, and with English version, poor translation quality make In their portfolio, and they went with a rebranded and discounted CADdy++ basic.īeckerCAD is marketed as being "fully compatible with AutoCAD", which may lure in somebody who expects AutoCAD for $150,Īnd ends up confused. I know nothing anything about the agreements between MuT and DataSolid, but I suspect MuT wanted a general-purpose CAD However, if you are an individual, you will not likely want to spend ~$900 for the basic version. Models is proprietary, and, while you can export 2D DWG/DXF and 3D ASIC solid data, the hassle related to migrating somewhere else You are unlikely to migrate to another solution since the file format used for the drawings and 3D Professional/Economy and add a bunch of extra modules (such as sheet metal bending or STEP import/export) to support your designĪnd manufacturing processes. Now, if you are a company and in need of a CAD, and you went with DataSolid, you'll likely will go to CADdy++ Mechanical Design Then we have Becker CAD editions (prices from Markt+Technik Verlag website): Supports 2D parametric modeling, ODMA interface, defining 3D models using outlines. Supports 2D and 3D parametric modeling, and everything in the Economy version. The CADdy++ lineup is as follows (see DataSolid Price list - )ĬADdy++ Mechanical Design Professional, €5,990 (~$6800 at the time of writing) Vendor lock-in and likely use economy/professional editions of the software. Is that hobbyists are not really a market for CADdy++, and companies which have for some reason selected CADdy++ are in some sort of ![]() I kept wondering why somebody would use CADdy++, given there are so many better alternatives with a larger feature set. Unfortunately,ģ years later, CADdy++ still has incomplete English translation of their UI and documentation, is not HiDPI-aware, and changes variousįiles within its installation directory, which I've complained about already. I've also installed the CADdy++ Basic 2021 and the only difference I found was the product names and minor menu updates. Label in the title bar of the main window, a DataSolid logo at the bottom of the window and a reference on the splash screen. Telltale signs of that were a prominent CADdy++ I have confirmed that BeckerCAD 3D 12 Pro is a rebranded DataSolid CADdy++ Basic 2019. If you are wondering if you should buy it, I would heavily lean "no".īefore jumping into unpacking that, let's explore the origins of this software package.ĬADdy++ English version showing German labels Building anything other than these will be a TL DR: I think this application is okay for basic sketches and some modeling of small 3-D printable things. On the other hand, they packed this powerful functionality into an application using outdated design and deployment practices, a proprietary file format,Īnd documentation that works against you. On one hand, it is clearly aiding you with design on a computer with support for DWG drawing and ACIS SAT solids. My take on this piece of software is mixed. IntelliCAD-based solutions, ViaCAD, or CorelCAD. A month after I started playing with BeckerCAD, I think I understand why it was released and why one may be interested in using this tool instead of, say,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |